top of page

Research & Analysis 

2025

August 15th Malaysia’s Economy Q2 2025 Malaysia’s Economy demonstrated resilience in the second quarter of 2025, with GDP expanding 4.4%, matching the first quarter’s pace, as detailed in Bank Negara Malaysia’s latest Quarterly Bulletin. This stability, against a backdrop of global trade frictions, reflects robust domestic demand offsetting external pressures. Growth Composition Private consumption rose 5.3%, up from 5%, bolstered by labor market improvements including a 3.0% unemployment rate and 3.4% wage growth. Investment surged, with gross fixed capital formation at 12.1%, driven by public and private initiatives in infrastructure and technology. However, net exports contracted sharply, contributing -72.6% to growth, as mining-related exports weakened amid lower commodity prices. Inflation and Policy Stance Headline inflation eased to 1.3%, influenced by negative fuel inflation (-0.6%) and moderated food prices (2.2%). Core inflation held at 1.9%, signaling contained pressures. The Monetary Policy Committee reduced the Overnight Policy Rate preemptively to support growth while inflation remains moderate, emphasizing vigilance on reform impacts. External Dynamics Exports of goods and services grew 2.6%, down from 4.1%, with electrical and electronics sustaining momentum but offset by declines in mining. The ringgit strengthened, appreciating 1.5% in nominal effective terms and 5.1% against the US dollar, aided by a weaker dollar index (-6.9%). Reserves stood at 4.7 months of imports, providing a buffer. Outlook and Risks The 2025 growth forecast has been revised to 4.0%-4.8% from 4.5%-5.5%, reflecting downside risks from US-China tariffs and geopolitical tensions. Upside potential lies in tourism recovery and intra-regional trade. Inflation is projected to stay moderate in the second half, contingent on global costs and domestic policies. Digital Services Trade The bulletin highlights digital services as a structural opportunity, with exports tripling since 2005 but imports outpacing, yielding a deficit. Strong linkages to manufacturing and higher productivity in digital-intensive sectors suggest policy focus on intellectual property, talent, and infrastructure could enhance competitiveness and resilience amid goods trade vulnerabilities. This report underscores Malaysia’s pivot toward domestic-led growth and digital diversification, navigating a more fragmented global environment. BNM Quarterly Bulletin 2Q 2025 Link: https://www.bnm.gov.my/documents/20124/19010089/qb25q2_en_book.pdf

August 19th Future of Global Fintech The World Economic Forum’s second edition on the Future of Global Fintech delineates a sector maturing amid post-pandemic normalization, with data from 240 firms revealing decelerating customer acquisition but resilient revenue streams, underscoring a pivot toward operational efficiency and inclusion. Market Performance From 2022 to 2023, average customer growth slowed to 37%, down from over 50% in prior years, reflecting saturation in mature markets and macroeconomic headwinds. Revenue growth, however, held firm at 40%, with Latin America and the Caribbean leading at 46%, followed by Asia-Pacific at 44%. Profitability followed suit at 39%, indicating fintechs’ ability to monetize existing bases amid tighter funding environments. This resilience points to a structural shift from volume-driven expansion to value extraction, particularly in emerging markets where underserved segments drive demand. Growth Drivers and Constraints Consumer demand and digital financial literacy emerge as primary enablers, supporting 32-45% of firms. Yet inhibitors persist, with macroeconomic instability cited by 40% in prior studies now eased but still relevant. Regulatory frameworks, perceived as adequate by most, correlate positively with performance: a favorable view boosts customer growth by 22% globally and 39% in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs), highlighting regulation’s role in unlocking scale. AI Integration AI adoption stands out as a transformative force, with 37% of firms implementing it in customer service and similar rates in risk management. Asia-Pacific leads at 33% full integration, insurtech vertically dominant. Impacts include enhanced profitability for 74%, cost reductions for 23% significantly, and workforce stability for 50%. However, risks like bias and adoption costs loom, potentially amplifying inequalities if unaddressed. This suggests AI as an inflection point for efficiency gains, reshaping competitive dynamics but demanding robust governance. Financial Inclusion Fintechs target underserved populations, with EMDEs showing higher inclusion metrics through affordable access. This focus not only sustains growth but amplifies macroeconomic effects, boosting consumption and resilience in volatile regions. Forward Outlook Priorities center on AI, open banking, and interoperability, fostering collaborations with incumbents. Yet geopolitical tensions and regulatory divergences could constrain EMDE potential, where fintech’s inclusion role is most acute. This maturation signals a balanced ecosystem, where technological leverage meets macro prudence, with EMDE trajectories pivotal to global financial stability. WEF Second Edition on the Future of Global Fintech PDF: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/2025-ccaf-future-of-global-fintech-2nd-edition.pdf

August 22nd State Lottery Analysis This brief distills Dhanam Prabawa Holdings’ analysis of state-run lotteries as instruments of non-tax revenue generation, annuity financing, and sovereign debt intermediation. The intent is to highlight their economic logic, relevance to sovereign fiscal structures. The Nature of State Lotteries State-run lotteries function as controlled monopolies designed to generate predictable streams of non-tax revenue. They are engineered with payout ratios, retailer commission structures, and government allocation levers that maximize fiscal inflows while maintaining public legitimacy. Unlike voluntary taxation, lotteries create an opt-in mechanism for public financing, often earmarked for education, healthcare, or infrastructure funds. Financing Mechanics Lottery proceeds underpin annuity-style obligations and revenue bonds issued by states to finance long-duration projects. Berkshire Hathaway, for example, has acted as a balance-sheet intermediary by purchasing lottery annuity streams, transforming state obligations into actuarially manageable liabilities. This establishes lotteries not merely as entertainment, but as quasi-sovereign financial instruments. Malaysia’s Context Malaysia has long relied on state-controlled monopolies across lotteries and gaming to strengthen its non-tax revenue base. These entities provide the federal and state governments with recurring fiscal inflows without directly raising tax burdens. This reliance reflects a broader Southeast Asian model where gaming and monopoly concessions anchor sovereign balance sheets. Closing Remarks State lotteries reveal how sovereigns engineer non-tax revenue through monopolistic control, converting public participation into annuity-backed financing structures.

August 25th Malaysia Bond Market H2 2025 Malaysia’s government is poised to moderate bond issuance in the second half of 2025, targeting RM64-90 billion for MGS and GII after a RM91 billion first half, as per a recent analysis from The Edge Malaysia. This deliberate restraint aligns with efforts to narrow the fiscal deficit to 3.8% of GDP from 4.3% in 2024, reflecting a structural commitment to fiscal consolidation amid subsidy reforms. Fiscal Strategy Development expenditure is set at RM85 billion for 2025, with MGS and GII exclusively funding such outlays under fiscal laws. Recent measures, including reduced electricity subsidies, expanded sales and service tax, and planned RON95 petrol subsidy rationalization by year-end, bolster revenue prospects. These steps could enhance fiscal space, reducing borrowing needs and mitigating debt accumulation, which stood at elevated levels post-pandemic. Market Dynamics Foreign holdings reached a record RM282.4 billion in May, comprising 22.5% of outstanding bonds, up from RM175 billion total issuance in 2024. Demand remains robust, with bid-to-cover ratios averaging nearly three times, supported by a deep domestic investor base including institutions like the Employees Provident Fund. This absorption capacity underscores Malaysia’s high-savings profile, potentially insulating the bond market from external shocks. Monetary Interplay Attention shifts to Bank Negara Malaysia’s policy stance, with economists divided on a potential 25 basis point Overnight Policy Rate cut following the July review—the first since May 2023. Such easing could amplify downward pressure on yields, particularly at the longer end, as new issuances carry lower coupons, enhancing the value of existing bonds. However, fluid inflation expectations may temper aggressive duration extensions. Broader Implications This issuance slowdown marks an inflection point toward sustainable fiscal management, potentially stabilizing the ringgit and lowering borrowing costs economy-wide. Yet, it intersects with global uncertainties, where subsidy reforms might introduce short-term inflationary pulses, influencing monetary decisions. In a regionally competitive landscape, these dynamics could strengthen Malaysia’s credit profile, fostering inward capital flows while highlighting the interplay between fiscal prudence and growth imperatives.

September 1st Global Credit Outlook Q3 As global credit markets contend with a shifting balance between growth deceleration and inflationary pressures from tariffs, BlackRock’s Q3 2025 outlook underscores the persistence of two-sided risks, where corporate resilience hinges on the interplay of margins, labor dynamics, and consumer spending. The report highlights a potential feedback loop: sustained input cost pressures could erode profit margins, prompting layoffs in a labor market characterized by low hiring rates, which in turn might weaken consumer demand and amplify economic softening. This dynamic, evident in muted layoffs (1.5% rate) and stable EBITDA margins (around 20% for IG, 28% for HY), signals an inflection point if tariff impacts prove persistent rather than transitory, challenging the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate amid anchored inflation expectations near 2.5-3%. In liquid credit, tight spreads contrast with attractive all-in yields (percentile ranks favoring HY over IG), supporting selective down-quality moves into BBB and BB segments where fundamentals remain solid—leverage at 3-4x and coverage above 4x. Yet dispersion persists, with CCC cohorts showing vulnerability at 1x coverage, reinforcing the need for granular analysis amid foreign demand’s role (over 25% of USD corporates held offshore), potentially moderating if U.S. exceptionalism fades. Private credit’s structural expansion, projected to $4.5 trillion AUM by 2030, reflects broadening borrower access and certainty of execution amid volatility, extending beyond middle-market to IG-like financing. In CRE, transaction volumes’ 14% YoY rise in Q1 suggests stabilizing values through higher rate acceptance, though uneven monthly data and maturity walls from amend-and-extend strategies warrant scrutiny. These insights align with longer-term themes of geographical diversification and asset class evolution, where macro uncertainties may accelerate shifts toward resilient, income-focused allocations while heightening risks in over-levered pockets. BlackRock PDF Reference: https://www.blackrock.com/institutions/en-us/literature/market-commentary/global-credit-outlook-q3-2025.pdf

September 4th Reflections on Fixed Income Dynamics Amid Evolving Trade and Fiscal Pressures The de-escalation of tariff announcements in early 2025 has tempered immediate threats to global growth and inflation trajectories, yet it underscores a broader reconfiguration in fixed income markets. Effective tariff rates in the US, having peaked near 30% during prior escalations and now stabilizing in the mid-teens, signal a partial retreat from protectionist extremes. This shift, however, coincides with mounting US fiscal strains—deficits climbing despite proposed spending reductions—and a dollar that has exhibited unusual weakness during risk-off episodes, diverging from its historical safe-haven behavior. These developments prompt a reevaluation of fixed income's role, not merely as a yield generator but as a lens into structural imbalances, including the interplay between sovereign debt issuance, foreign reserve allocations, and monetary policy divergences across regions. In the US, the persistence of above-target inflation—annualized rates trending higher over the past three and six months—complicates the Federal Reserve's path, particularly as labor market softening emerges from policy-driven sectors. Education, health services, and leisure have driven 71% of private employment growth in recent years, sectors now vulnerable to federal funding cuts in Medicaid and universities. This could accelerate a slowdown in hiring, potentially reigniting rate cuts, but it also highlights a bifurcation: robust consumption and investment data reflect household balance sheets at multi-decade strengths, with debt-to-net-worth ratios at seven-decade lows. Fixed income allocations here favor income over duration, as front-end yields remain elevated relative to historical norms, often exceeding run-rate inflation by substantial margins. Over the past two decades, assets like US two-year Treasuries have spent minimal time in yield buckets above 5%, a rarity that now offers carry with limited extension risk, especially in the belly of the curve where convexity gains appeal amid potential shocks. Globally, the tariff unwind introduces asymmetric pressures: inflationary for the US as the imposing economy, but deflationary for targeted exporters, amplifying rate-cutting cycles in Europe and parts of Asia. This dynamic fosters capital reallocation away from US assets, where non-US investors entered the year at record exposure levels. European fixed income, bolstered by increased sovereign issuance from programs like Germany's defense and infrastructure initiatives, stands to benefit from enhanced liquidity and stability. Data on 10-year rate changes post-tariff announcements reveal declines in German Bunds contrasting with rises in US Treasuries, illustrating divergent hedging efficacy. In this context, regional specialization becomes critical; bottom-up security selection in European banks—insulated from tariffs and supported by solid first-quarter results—outweighs broad directional bets, as macro themes yield to issuer-specific dispersions. The evolving utility of duration as a portfolio hedge merits scrutiny, particularly through a systematic perspective. Traditional long-end US Treasuries have underperformed in recent risk-off environments, a "new conundrum" where long rates rise amid anticipated Fed easing, driven by inflation uncertainty persisting above target for over four years, surging Treasury supply, and waning demand from foreign central banks. Sentiment indicators, derived from language models analyzing fiscal policy discourse, show a sharper rebound in expansionary expectations in Germany versus the US, correlating with market-implied economic regimes that price softer landings in Europe. Cumulative returns to "hard landing" versus "soft landing" portfolios have retraced post-tariff surges in the US but maintain a positive gap favoring Europe, suggesting underpriced Fed cuts relative to the ECB's two anticipated moves for the year. Shorter maturities, leveraged to match impact, and global exposures thus offer superior hedging properties, challenging reliance on US-centric duration. Municipal bonds exemplify resilience amid these shifts, with tax-equivalent yields resetting to decade highs—around 6.8% for investment grade and 9.9% for high yield—amid favorable summer supply-demand imbalances. Their insulation from trade disruptions stems from fee-based essential services and tax revenues tied to domestic activity, with median state trade-to-GDP ratios with China at just 1.4%. State balance sheets, fortified by rainy-day funds at record percentages of general fund spending, provide buffers against slowdowns, while property tax revenues benefit from sustained home price appreciation. This alignment with "America First" infrastructure priorities positions high-quality state and local debt as a counterweight to credit volatility in exposed sectors like healthcare and higher education. Extending beyond borders, USD-hedged international bonds enhance diversification, capitalizing on deflationary impulses in non-US regions that could depress rates further. Short-term TIPS address near-term inflation surprises, but longer-term allocations to global investment-grade debt—particularly in Europe—offer price appreciation potential as central banks diverge from the Fed's stance. Portfolio construction must account for active risk, ensuring international exposures do not unduly alter overall duration or credit profiles, especially when equities present asymmetric opportunities. These observations point to an inflection in fixed income's structural role: from reliable ballast to a barometer of fiscal sustainability and geopolitical realignments. The US's elevated financing needs—highest among G7 peers, with short debt maturities and weekly issuance exceeding half a trillion dollars—amplify risks of higher borrowing costs if private absorption falters. While full de-dollarization remains remote absent scalable alternatives, incremental shifts toward gold in reserves could erode the dollar's dominance if debt trajectories persist unchecked. Monitoring these interconnections will be essential as policy uncertainties unfold into the latter half of 2025.

October 7th Pictet’s Secular Outlook 2025 delineates four investment trends amid a landscape of converging asset returns, where subdued growth and lingering inflation erode the historical edge of US-dominated portfolios. As a global macro investor, I interpret these patterns as marking an inflection point toward greater regional and asset class diversification, challenging the post-2008 reliance on US exceptionalism. The erosion of US asset primacy stands out, with policy shifts under the Trump administration—such as tariffs and fiscal expansions—likely amplifying deficits and pressuring stocks, bonds, and the dollar. This microeconomic drag stems from elevated valuations and savings-investment imbalances, linking to macroeconomic risks like accelerated de-globalization and potential currency realignments, which could heighten volatility in cross-border flows. Concurrently, conditions favor income-generating assets, as nominal rates in advanced economies drift toward zero amid demographic pressures from ageing populations seeking yield stability. Historical data on inflation-adjusted 10-year government bond returns illustrate this shift, with past bull markets suggesting renewed potential for fixed income, though it risks tighter credit spreads and diminished real yields in a low-growth regime. The expansion of private markets reflects a structural pivot, where institutional capital increasingly pursues illiquidity premia in alternatives like private equity and real assets. This trend underscores microeconomic efficiencies in capital deployment but connects to broader risks of opacity and liquidity mismatches, particularly if public market correlations rise during stress events. Finally, the imperative to extend beyond mega-cap equities highlights opportunities in mid-caps and secular themes such as IT, pharmaceuticals, and industrials, where innovation offsets aggregate growth constraints. This aligns with longer-term dynamics of technological diffusion yet exposes portfolios to sector-specific disruptions and geopolitical frictions affecting supply chains. These observations reinforce our empirical focus on adaptive strategies attuned to evolving global interdependencies. PDF Reference: file:///C:/Users/user/AppData/Local/Temp/MicrosoftEdgeDownloads/8fbb89b2-4019-49d3-96e3-b44c6b2b5260/Secular_Outlook_2025_Four_Investment_Trends_1759831118.pdf

Communications & Publications Disclaimer

Any communications, commentary, analysis, or research materials published by Dhanam Prabawa Holdings, whether through this website, private correspondence, or other authorised channels, are intended solely for informational and reference purposes. Such materials reflect the firm’s internal views, assessments, and observations at the time of writing, and are derived from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information contained therein. Nothing in these communications should be construed as, or relied upon for, any investment, financial, legal, accounting, or tax advice. 

Level 26, Maxis Tower, Kuala Lumpur City Centre, 50088 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Official Channel

  • LinkedIn

Legal Disclaimer

Dhanam Prabawa Holdings (hereinafter the “Company”) is a privately held Investment Holding Company (IHC) currently in formation. The Company is organized solely to acquire, hold and manage proprietary and privately-committed capital and expressly does not, and will not, solicit, accept or manage capital from the public or retail investors. Seed capital is provided by the founder’s personal investment portfolio; the Company is established as a private capital institution charged with the exclusive mandate to steward proprietary capital and private assets contributed by the founder and a limited number of private co-investors. The Company intends to effect formal incorporation as a private limited company under and in strict compliance with the Companies Act 2016 (Malaysia), with incorporation targeted for completion in late 2026. Upon incorporation, assets currently held on behalf of the founder and private co-investors will be transferred to, and formally recognized as, corporate assets of the Company in accordance with applicable law and accounting standards.

 

Dhanam Prabawa Holdings is not licensed, registered, or regulated by the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) under the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA), and does not offer, promote, or conduct any capital market activities as defined under Schedule 2 of the CMSA. These include, but are not limited to:

 

  1. Fund management or portfolio management;

  2. Investment advisory or research services provided to third parties;

  3. Financial planning;

  4. Distribution, marketing, or offering of investment products.

 

In addition, Dhanam is not licensed or supervised by Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), and does not conduct any financial services business, including banking, deposit-taking, insurance, or money services as regulated under the Financial Services Act 2013 or Islamic Financial Services Act 2013. It does not engage in any activities regulated under the Trust Companies Act 1949, which governs companies that act as trustees, executors, administrators, or provide fiduciary services on behalf of clients or the public. Dhanam neither manages estates nor holds assets in trust for third parties and therefore falls entirely outside the scope of this legislation.

 

The company likewise does not fall within the ambit of the Money Services Business Act 2011, which regulates money-changing, remittance, and wholesale currency services. Dhanam conducts no foreign exchange operations for clients, does not process remittances, and does not operate e-wallets, payment gateways, or any other money service businesses requiring licensing under this Act.

​

Dhanam is not subject to the Labuan Financial Services and Securities Act 2010 or the Labuan Islamic Financial Services and Securities Act 2010, which cover offshore financial entities involved in fund management, captive insurance, trust business, leasing, factoring, or offshore banking in the Labuan International Business and Financial Centre. Dhanam does not operate in Labuan, does not offer offshore investment vehicles, and has no intention of providing cross-border financial services that would require Labuan licensing or regulatory oversight.

​

Dhanam Prabawa Holdings does not engage in any activities regulated under Securities Industry (Central Depositories) Act 1991 (SICDA). The company does not operate a securities depository, maintain Central Depository System (CDS) accounts on behalf of third parties, or facilitate securities clearing and settlement functions. All investments are conducted strictly through licensed brokers and custodians in the founder’s or company’s own name, with no provision of depository, nominee, or intermediary services to external parties.

​

Dhanam does not participate in, endorse, or tolerate any form of bribery, gratification, or corrupt practices as defined under the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (MACC Act). The company does not engage in activities requiring dealings with public funds, government contracts, or procurement processes that may give rise to corruption risk. Its investment activities are entirely private capital based, thus eliminating exposure to public sector corruption vulnerabilities. Dhanam upholds the highest standards of governance, integrity, and compliance across all its activities. The company operates with zero tolerance for corruption, bribery, or any practice inconsistent with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 and maintains strict internal discipline to ensure that all investments and operations are conducted ethically, transparently, and in full accordance with applicable laws.

 

Dhanam does not hold monies, dividends, deposits, or unclaimed financial assets on behalf of third parties. The company’s investment cash flows are fully proprietary, managed solely for internal purposes. Since it does not act as a custodian, registrar, or trustee, there is no circumstance under which the Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965 would apply to its operations.
​

Further, Dhanam does not engage in any activities governed by the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (AMLA) — such as money services business, remittance, or financial intermediation for clients. It is not involved in activities under the Co-operative Societies Act 1993, such as pooling public funds through member contributions, operating credit co-operatives, or conducting co-operative financing schemes. Nor does it undertake activities restricted by the public offering provisions of the Companies Act 2016, which include inviting the public to subscribe for shares, debentures, or collective investment schemes.

 

The company does not conduct deposit-taking (e.g., bank-like savings or fixed deposits), fundraising from the public (e.g., crowdfunding, bond or share offerings), or securities issuance (e.g., IPOs, private placements to external investors). It also does not operate in any fiduciary, custodial, or consumer-facing capacity such as trust services, fund management for clients, or financial advisory roles.

​

Jurisdictional Scope
This disclaimer applies exclusively to the laws of Malaysia. Dhanam Prabawa Holdings does not claim or represent compliance with, nor does it seek to operate under, any foreign regulatory or supervisory regimes outside Malaysia. Any references to investments or markets outside Malaysia are strictly for informational and analytical purposes only, and shall not be construed as activities conducted within, or regulated by, such jurisdictions.

 

Dhanam’s future incorporation will comply with the Companies Act 2016, and its tax position will align with the Investment Holding Company (Unlisted) classification under Section 60F of the Income Tax Act 1967, as clarified in LHDN Public Ruling No. 2/2024. The company’s income will be derived exclusively from investment sources, including dividends, interest, and capital gains. It will not generate income from business, trade, or services.

 

Any views, commentary, economic analysis, or research insights shared through this website are intended for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing contained herein should be construed as investment advice, an offer to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or a solicitation to manage funds. No representation is made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided, and readers are advised to seek independent financial, legal, and tax advice before acting on any information discussed.

 

© 2026 by Dhanam Prabawa Holdings. All Rights Reserved. 

 

Official Contact
Phone: +603-4821-2333
Email: dhanamprabawaholdings@outlook.com

Fraud and Impersonation Advisory

Dhanam Prabawa Holdings (“Dhanam”) reminds all stakeholders and visitors to remain vigilant against potential fraudulent activity involving the unauthorized use of the firm’s name, brand, or representatives.

 

The firm does not initiate contact with individuals via social media platforms, messaging applications, or any digital channels—including, but not limited to, WhatsApp, Telegram, Facebook, or email—to offer investment opportunities or solicit any payments. Any communication claiming to represent Dhanam through these channels should be treated with caution.

 

All official engagement with Dhanam is conducted exclusively via our verified LinkedIn profile. Stakeholders are encouraged to verify communications and connect only through this channel to ensure authenticity.

 

Anyone encountering suspicious outreach or activity should refrain from responding and may report the incident by contacting Dhanam through our official LinkedIn page. The safeguarding of trust, security, and confidentiality for all stakeholders remains a top priority for Dhanam, and we appreciate your continued attention to this matter.

​

Official Communications 

Dhanam Prabawa Holdings recognizes only the contact details listed on this website as official channels of communication. Any correspondence or representation made through other emails, phone numbers, or third-party platforms not listed here is not authorized by Dhanam Prabawa Holdings and shall not be deemed valid or binding on the company.

bottom of page